Update: February 24, 2023 The new version of Termout.org is now online, so this web site is now obsolete and will soon be dismantled. |
academic discourse |
: 11. Bunton, D. (2002). Generic moves in Ph. D. introduction chapters. En J. Flowerdew (Comp.), Academic discourse (pp. 57-75). Londres: Longman. : 12. Burgess, S. (2002). Packed houses and intimate gatherings: Audience and rhetorical structure. En J. Flowerdew (Comp.), Academic discourse (pp. 197-215). Londres: Longman. : 19. Fløttum, Kjersti. 2003. Bibliographical references and polyphony in research articles. En K. Fløttum & F. Rastier (eds.), Academic discourse. Multidisciplinary approaches, 97-119. Oslo: Novus Press. : 19. Hyland, K. (2002). Activity and evaluation: Reporting practices in academic writing. En J. Flowerdew (Ed.), Academic discourse (pp. 115-130). London: Longman. : 25. Flowerdew, J. (2002). Academic discourse. Londres: Longman. : 25. Hyland, K. (2005). Stance and engagement: A model of interaction in academic discourse. Discourse Studies, 7 ( 2), 173-192. : 26. Vassileva, I. (2000). Who is the author? A Contrastive Analysis of Authorial Presence in English, German, French, Russian and Bulgarian Academic Discourse. Sankt Augustin: As-gard. : 28. Fløttum, K. (2009). Academic voices in the research article. En E. Suomela-Salmi y F. Dervin (coords.), Cross-linguistic and cross-cultural perspectives on academic discourse (pp. 109-133). Ámsterdam: John Benjamins. : 3. Bhatia, V. K. (2002). A generic view of academic discourse. En J. Flowerdew (Comp.), Academic discourse (pp. 21-39). Harlow: Pearson Education. : 41. Hunston, S. (1994). Evaluation and organization in a sample of written academic discourse. En M. Coulthard (coord.), Advances in written text analysis (pp. 191- 218). Londres: Routledge. : 6. Bhatia, V. K. ( 2002). A generic view of academic discourse. En J. Flowerdew (Comp.), Academic discourse (pp. 21-39). Harlow: Longman. : 61. Spack, R. (1988). Initiating ESL Students into the Academic Discourse Community: How Far Should We Go? TESOL Quarterly, 22, 29-51. : 62. Spack, R. (1993). Student meets text, text meets student: Finding a way into academic discourse. In: I. Leki & J. Carson (Eds.), Reading in the composition classroom (pp. 32-60). Boston: Heinle & Heinle. : 67. Zamel, V. (1993). Questioning academic discourse. College ESL, 3, 28-39. : Bamford, J. (2005). Subjective or objective evaluation? Prediction in academic lectures (pp. 16-29). In Elena Tognini-Bonelli and Gabriella L.Camiciotti (eds.), Strategies in Academic Discourse, Florence: John Benjamins Publishing. : Basturkmen, H., Meast, M. & Bitchener, J. (2014). Supervisors' on-script feedback comments on drafts of dissertations: socializing students into the academic discourse community. Teaching in Higher Education, 19(4), 432-445. : Bathia, V. (2002). A generic view of academic discourse. En J. Flowerdew (Ed.), Academic discourse (pp. 21-39). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. : Bennett, K. (2010a). Academic discourse in Portugal: A whole different ballgame? Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 9(1), 21-32. [192]http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2009.11.002 : Benítez Castro, M. A. & Thompson, P. (2015). Shell-nounhood in academic discourse. A critical state-of-the art review. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 20(3), 378-404. : Bhatia, V (2002). A Generic View of Academic Discourse. In J. Flowerdew (Ed.), Academic Discourse (pp. 21-39). London: Longman. : Bizzell, P. (1982) College composition: Initiation into the academic discourse community. Curriculum Inquiry , 12, 191-207. : Bizzell, P. (1992). Academic discourse and critical consciousness. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press. : Bondi, M. & Lorés-Sanz, R. (eds.). (2014). Abstracts in academic discourse: Variation and change. Bern: Peter Lang . : Bondi, M. (2002). Attitude and episteme in academic discourse: Adverbials of stance across genres and moves. Textus, 15(2), 249-264. : Bondi, M. (2005). Metadiscursive practices in academic discourse: Variation across genres and disciplines. J. Bamford and M, Bondi (Eds.), Dialogue within discourse communities: Metadiscursive perspectives on academic genres, 3-30. : Bondi, M. (2014). Changing Voices: Authorial Voice in Abstracts. En M. Bondi y R. Lorés-Sanz (Eds.), Abstracts in Academic Discourse: Variation and change (pp. 243-270). Berna, Suiza: Peter Lang. : Bunton, D. (2002). Generic moves in Ph.D. thesis introductions. En J. Flowerdew (Ed.), Academic Discourse (pp. 57-75). Londres: Longman. : Burgess, S. (2002). Packed houses and intimate gatherings: Audience and rhetorical Structure. En J. Flowerdew (Ed.), Academic Discourse (pp. 196-215). Harlow, Inglaterra: Pearson Education. : Busch-Lauer, I. (2014). Abstracts: Cross-Linguistic, Disciplinary and Intercultural Perspectives. In M. Bondi & R. Lorés-Sanz (eds.), Abstracts in Academic Discourse: Variation and Change, (pp. 43-64). Bern: Peter Lang . : Cavalieri, Silvia. (2014). Variation Across Disciplines. The case of Applied Linguistics and Medicine. En: Bondi, Marina y Lorés, Rosa. Abstracts in Academic Discourse: Variation and Change. (161-174). Berna, Suiza: Peter Lang. : Crismore, A. & Farnsworth, R. (1990). Metadiscourse in popular and professional discourse. En W. Nash (Ed.), The writing scholar: Studies in the language and conventions of academic discourse (pp. 118136). Newbury Park, CA: Sage. : Dahl, T. (2003). Metadiscourse in research articles. En K. Fløttum & F. Rastier (Eds.), Academic discourse. Multidisciplinary approaches (pp. 120-138). Oslo: Novus Press. : Davies, F. (1998). Reading between the lines: thematic choices as a device for presenting writers viewpoint in academic discourse. Especialist, 9, 173-200. : Diani, G. (2014). On English and Italian Research Article Abstracts: Genre Variation Across Cultures. En M. Bondi y R. Lorés-Sanz(Eds.), Abstracts in Academic Discourse: Variation and Change (pp. 65-84). Berna, Suiza: Peter Lang. : Díez Prados, Mercedes. (2018). Abstracts nouns as metadiscursive shells in academic discourse. Caplletra, 64, 153-178. : Flottum, K., Kinn, T. & Dahl, T. (2006). We now report on Versus Let us now see how: Author roles and interaction with readers in research articles. In K. Hyland & M. Bondi (Eds.), Academic discourse across disciplines (pp. 203-224). Bern: Peter Lang. : Flowerdew, J. (2002). Introduction: Approaches to analysis of academic discourse in English. En J. Flowerdew (ed.), Academic Discourse (pp. 1-17). London: Longman. : Flowerdew, J. (Ed.) (2002). Academic discourse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. : Flowerdew, John. (2002). Introduction: Approaches to analysis of academic discourse in English. En J. Flowerdew (Ed.), Academic discourse (pp. 1-17). Londres, Inglaterra: Longman. : Fløttum, K. (2003). Bibliographical references and polyphony in research articles. En K. Fløttum & F. Rastier (Eds.), Academic discourse. Multidisciplinary approaches (pp. 97-119). Oslo: Novus Press. : Giménez-Moreno, Rosa. 1997. The boundaries of the concepts of genre, register and style in Academic Discourse. Jordi Piqué and David J. Viera (eds.) Applied Languages: Theory and Practice in ESP. Valencia: Universitat de Valência, 37- 45. : Gunnarson, B. (1998). "Academic discourse in changing context frames: the construction and development of a genre". En P. Evangelisti (Edit) Academic discourse in Europe . Roma: Bulzoni. : Hunston, S. (1994). Evaluation and organization in a sample of written academic discourse. In M. Coulthard (Ed.), Advances in written text analysis (pp. 191-218). London, New York: Routledge. : Huschová, P. (2015). Exploring modal verbs conveying possibility in academic discourse. Discourse and Interaction, 8(2), 35-47. : Hyland, K. & Bondi, M. (2006). Academic discourse across disciplines. Bern: Peter Lang. : Hyland, K. (2002). Activity and evaluation: Reporting practices in academic writing. En J. Flowerdew (Ed.), Academic discourse (pp. 115-130). Londres: Longman. : Hyland, K. (2005). Stance and Engagement: A Model of Interaction in Academic Discourse. Discourse Studies, 7(2), 173-192. : Hyland, K. (2007). Applying a gloss: Exemplifying and reformulating in academic discourse.Applied Linguistics,28(2), 266-285. : Hyland, K. (2009). Academic Discourse. London: Continuum discourse series. : Hyland, K. (2009). Academic discourse. English in a global context. Continuum International Publishing Group. : Hyland, K. (2009). Academic discourse. London: Continuum . : Hyland, K. (2009). Academic discourse: English in a global context. Continuum. : Hyland, K. (2012). Disciplinary Identities. Individuality and Community in Academic Discourse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. : Hyland, Ken. (2005). Stance and engagement: a model of interaction in academic discourse. Discourse Studies, 7, 173-192. : Hyland, Ken. (2011). Academic discourse. En K. Hyland y B. Paltridge (Eds.), The continuum companion to discourse analysis (pp. 171-184). Londres, Inglaterra: Continuum. : Hyland, Ken. 2005. Stance and engagement: a model of interaction in academic discourse, Discourse studies, 7, 2: 173-192. : Hyland, Ken. 2009. Academic discourse: english in a global context, New York, Continuum International Publishing Group. : Ignatieva, N. (2019). Transitive and attitudinal aspects in a functional analysis of academic discourse in Spanish. Open Journal of Modern Linguistics, 9, 165-178. : Key Words: Academic discourse, professional discourse, disciplinary discourse, Corpus linguistics, Corpus PUCV-2006. : Keywords: discourse genres, academic discourse, PUCV-2010 Corpus, disciplinarity, Phd studies. : Lorés-Sanz, R. (2009). Different worlds, different audiences: a contrastive analysis of research article abstracts. En E. Suomela-Salmi y F. Darvin (Eds.), Cross-linguistic and Cross-cultural Perspectives on Academic Discourse (pp. 187-198). Ámsterdam, Holanda: John Benjamins. : Matsuda, P. & Jeffery, J. (2012). Voice in student essays. En K. Hyland & C. Sancho Guinda (Eds.), Stance and voice in academic discourse (pp. 151-156). Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan. : Mauranen, A. (2003). Evaluative language use in academic discourse. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 2, 269-271. : Mauranen, A. (2009). Spoken rhetoric: How do natives and non-natives fare? In E. Suomela-Salmi & F. Dervin (Eds.), Cross-linguistic and cross-cultural perspectives on academic discourse (pp. 199-218). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. : Nash, W. (1990). The stuff these people write. In W. Nash (Ed.), The writing scholar: studies in the language and conventions of academic discourse (pp. 8-30). Newbury Park, California: Sage. : Oakey, D. (2005). Academic vocabulary in academic discourse: The phraseological behaviour of evaluation in Economics research articles. En E. Tognini-Bonelli & G. Del Lungo (eds.), Strategies in academic discourse (pp. 169-183). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. : Okamura, A. & Shaw, P. (2014). Development of Academic Journal Abstracts in Relation to the Demands of Stakeholders. In M. Bondi & R. Lorés-Sanz (eds.), Abstracts in Academic Discourse: Variation and Change, (pp. 287-318). Bern: Peter Lang . : Pecorari, Diane . 2008. Repeated language in academic discourse: the case of Biology background statements, Nordic Journal of English Studies, 7, 3: 9-33 : Rutten, K. (2011). Academic Discourse and Literacy Narratives as "Equipment for Living". ClCWeb: Comparative literature and Culture, 13(4), s. p. : Samraj, B. (2002). Disciplinary Variation in Abstracts: The Case of Wildlife Behavior and Conservation Biology. In J. Flowerdew (ed.), Academic Discourse (pp. 40-56). London: Pearson. : Silver, Marc. (2006). Language across disciplines: Towards a critical reading of contemporary academic discourse. Florida, Estados Unidos: Brown Walker Press. : Sinclair, J. (2005). Language as a string of beads: Discourse and the M-word. En E. Tognini-Bonelli & G. Del Lungo Camiciotti (Eds.), Strategies in academic discourse (pp. 163-168). Ámsterdam: John Benjamins. : Stotsky, S. (1983). Types of lexical cohesion in expository Writing: Implications for developing the vocabulary of academic discourse. College Composition and Communication, 34(4), 430-446. : Suomela-Salmi, E. & Dervin, F. (Eds.) (2009). Cross-linguistic and Cross-cultural perspectives on academic discourse. Ámsterdam: John Benjamins. : Swales, J. (2004). Evaluation in academic speech: First forays. Academic discourse: new insights into evaluation. Bern: Peter Lang, 31-53. : Tribble, C. (2002). Corpora and corpus analysis: New windows on academic writing. En Flowerdew, J. (Ed.), Academic discourse (131-149), Londres: Routledge. : Tse, P & Hyland, K. (2006). Gender and Discipline: Exploring Metadiscourse Variation in Academic Book Reviews. In K. Hyland Y M. Bondi (eds.) Academic Discourse across Disciplines (pp. 177-202). Bern: Peter Lang . : Vassileva, I. (2000). Who is the author? A contrastive analysis of authorial presence in English, German, French, Russian and Bulgarian academic discourse. Sankt Augustin: Asgard Verlag. : Vassileva, I. (2009). Argumentative strategies in conference discussion sessions. In E. Suomela-Salmi & F. Dervin (Eds.), Cross-linguistics and cross-cultural perspectives on academic discourse (pp. 219-240). Amsterdam: John Benjamin. : Williams, I. A. (2010). Cultural differences in Academic Discourse. Evidence from first-person verb use in the methods sections of medical research articles. Special Issue of International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 15(2), 214-239. : [97]Hyland, Ken. 2009. Academic discourse: english in a global context, New York, Continuum International Publishing Group. : Álvarez-Gil, F. J. (2020). A disciplinary analysis of fairly in late modern English scientific writing. In M. L. Carrió-Pastor (Ed.),Corpus Analysis in Different Genres: Academic Discourse and Learner Corpora(pp. 93-107). New York: Routledge. : Ädel, A. (2005). On the boundaries between evaluation and metadiscourse. En E. Tognini-Bonelli & G. Del Lungo Camiciotti (Eds.), Strategies in academic discourse (pp. 153-162). Ámsterdam: John Benjamins. |